Добро пожаловать, гость! [ Регистрация | Вход

Подать объявление

Об dahliabeech91

Аватар

Описание

file down site
fast file site
When compared to following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially in the case of videos, the next cloud must be downloaded all together, while streaming. Merely to stream! I need to install another app again. Cloud alone is not enough to stream.

Faster compared to the next cloud. About 20%.

Once you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks significantly less than the next cloud (but breaking itself is already a problem).

Web app is supported. It's rudimentary, but it is possible to write. However, the thing is that the document format is really a bizarre format, such as for example .ndoc, that makes it extremely incompatible.

File sharing through the URL (but this is as far as another cloud is concerned).

Webhard

It has a smaller capacity compared to the next cloud.

p2p 순위 Compared to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality.

Compared to the next cloud, it is extremely disadvantageous for music playback. Continuous streaming can be done only for several selected sound sources. The next cloud only should be in a folder.

You will need to share a URL and that means you can't share music files or videos.

According to the report, there is a saying that N drive appears like a local drive when installed, but only it comes out like a local drive, that is no different from the folder synchronization setting. It's a whole lot worse for computers in the first place when external programs play tricks in it. It's much better to just clean up the synchronization folder.***

It is extremely specialized in playing music. Specifically, it is the only cloud that can play sound sources within an environment similar to MP3 players we are acquainted with. Although each song has some buffering, it seems to play up to 192kpbs continuously, assuming that communication is in good shape in a 3G environment. Needless to say, in reality, it's often cut off at that point)

It has a large capacity. It is just a significant advantage when considering domestic cloud services all together, which have poor quality of media access in cloud services.

You can substitute the finish drive above. In particular, if a picture is contained in a document, it is rarely opened properly.

Streaming songs often cuts off (but not often) due to communication problems with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. Personally i think like it's about once every two hours. And if you pay attention to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you are in a place where in fact the 3G environment isn't smooth, it gets take off more often. And when it's in that state, you have to find the path of the folder where the song was playing and play it again.

The only way to talk about is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are for sale to file viewing. Aside from those points, you'll find nothing to say even if it is almost a webhard level.

Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive)

Google Drive

It exerts tremendous power on paper documents. In particular, even lacking any office program, Google Drive can cover it somewhat. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, almost any simple document is OK.

It is advantageous to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By establishing only offline views, the files you work on can continue to be reflected in the cloud in real time. It is a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users.

It is easy to connect with other Google services such as for example Gmail.

If you don't upload documents directly to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capacity of the file does not take into account cloud storage (what can you mean, if you just use the web app, the capacity of the Google drive is infinite).

Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. It is possible to flip through photos and videos could be played right away. However, the loading time seems to take a little longer compared to the dropbox. I feel it), nonetheless it doesn't bother me.

There are probably the most apps that may be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the web environment without installing programs using the pc. It's a bit of a problem that the app doesn't connect at all on mobile, but it is the best in the desktop environment.

Upload a little pdf file and change it to Google Docs format. It can then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it really is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less.

There is no bandwidth restriction in name. There's a testimony that it is a block after a large amount of writing, but it isn't stipulated by company policy.

If you are using Google Docs web app, it is possible to save documents indefinitely, but in the event that you save them indefinitely, it is the same as once you lose your Internet connection, you are going to sink and work with MS word, right?)

Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files utilizing a variety of programs, nonetheless it is still crude in comparison to office programs applied to computers.Is it obvious?)


Dropbox

It exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Can be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services require a specific amount of buffering time for each photo). However, in the event that you wait a bit for the dropbox, the photos in one folder are loaded entirely. While considering Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling is possible without the blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, it is possible to freely specify before start of playback. It's the best in the world in terms of media reading.

There are various method of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the company level, etc.



The speed is relatively good. It is a lot faster than the Box and doesn't bother with Google Drive.

The file capacity limit that could be uploaded from a free account may be the largest. 300MB.

The bandwidth of the free account is larger than that of the Box. It is updated by 20GB per day. It's practically infinite unless you are going to share large files.

The starting capacity is the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt.

Price compared to capacity is the most expensive cloud service. Dirty bastards...

There is a saying that changes in documents can't be reflected instantly when working on documents.

Word documents shouldn't flip different files like picture documents.

The dropbox itself can't be documented.

There are probably the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. In order to work on a document, it is possible to choose the interface you need through the app drive and focus on it leisurely.

Regarding document files, simple document inquiry is really a convenient axis because previews are given. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if there are multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents may also be flipped over the file or file, as can be seen in the photo file.

File sharing support is fairly good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a web page to share data conveniently with little usage of the net page's resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB per month, which is quite small.

Slow. Not paid people.

Media access is quite disadvantageous. It's even worse than Google Drive, which says it's disadvantageous above. It's better to just do it on some type of computer than pay attention to it for a test.

The uploadable file capacity limit may be the smallest. 100MB. Free account only.

In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported.

Unless you install Boxeditor, the documentation will be written with an extension that may only be written on Box (it works, so it is much better than Dropbox, but it's less than Google Drive).

It was recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is currently quite convenient. Especially photo files. However the pace is still a bit slow.***

Skydrive

The writing function is quite powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive's is the most like the MS office documenting environment we've often used. And there are also the most supported handwriting, even though it is four-legged.

The basic capacity is rather good. 7GB. Well, it's not that strong a difference.

It is no exaggeration to state that the interface of mobile apps may be the most backward cloud service ever.

Извините, объявлений не найдено.